Categories
University Politics

ETH Board Decision on Tuition Fee Increase

It feels like we are back in March of this year: During the last ETH Board meeting on July 10-11, it was decided to triple the tuition fees for international students and to adjust all tuition fees according to inflation. This issue had already been discussed and rejected in March, but unfortunately, the proposal was accepted this time.

How did this renewed discussion and drastic reversal occur just four months later? Here, politics play a crucial role. As you may know, the National Council and the Council of States have discussed a potential amendment to the ETH Law in connection with the 2025-2028 BFI message, which, among other things, sets the budget for the ETH domain. This amendment would mandate significantly higher tuition fees for international students and enjoys broad support from a majority of parties, including those usually against such increases (e.g., the SP). To preempt this substantial intrusion into ETH’s autonomy, the ETH Board decided to revisit the issue and ultimately changed its decision.

The VSETH continues to oppose this decision. Data from the WiegETH’s survey, which we conducted earlier this year, already show the severe consequences such an increase would have. Here are some not-so-fun facts from the data:

  • A total of 51% of international students report that they would need a new scholarship after the increase. Additionally, 15% of international students say they would need an additional scholarship to complement their existing one, while only 5% indicate they could continue their studies without any scholarship.
  • Master’s students without an ETH bachelor’s degree would be especially reliant on scholarships.
  • When asked whether they would have chosen a different university if the tuition fees at ETH were CHF 2190 per semester, 31% of students overall said they would have chosen a different university, and 36% were unsure. Only 32% could say with certainty that they would have chosen ETH again.

Overall, these figures clearly show that the planned increase will significantly impact the financial situation of countless students. They also indicate that an ETH education would no longer be feasible for many under these new circumstances, and numerous new scholarships would be needed. The loss of these international students would not only greatly reduce diversity at ETH but also keep talented professionals away from Switzerland, exacerbating the country’s skilled labor shortage.

How will things proceed for us students now? The increase is set to be introduced starting from the fall semester of 2025. All students already enrolled will not be affected by this increase due to a transitional regulation, meaning that students who are currently matriculated will be able to complete their Bachelor’s or Master’s degree without a fee increase.

And what has VSETH planned to do against this decision? For VSETH, it is very clear: this decision must be challenged. An increase in tuition fees is not a good decision in any respect (the data speaks for itself), and we should loudly oppose it.

VSETH will of course be heavily involved in the hearing within the ETH domain. Additionally, we are already planning an action day in the first weeks of the semester, where all students can participate and protest against this decision. The exact date of the action day has not yet been set, but stay updated through the tuition fees newsletter or the VSETH Instagram account!

Categories
University Politics

A Glimpse of Hope

Dear all,

Today the WBK-S (the Committee for Science, Education and Culture of the Council of States) met and discussed our tuition fee increase.

They voted 6 to 5 in favour of at least doubling (instead of tripling) the tuition fees for foreign students.

There is still a lot of money at stake and of course we will continue to do everything we can to ensure that there is no increase in tuition fees at all. BUT: We must not forget that this is already a huge success. Not only does this change save students around CHF 1500 per year compared to the original proposal. In addition, if the Council of States and the National Council do not agree, the proposal will go back to the National Council where it will have to be discussed again. In the best-case scenario, we have therefore just saved a year in which all students will pay the old fees because the decision will not be implemented in time for 2025/26 and furthermore this gives us more time to work against the entire increase.

As usual, all this should be taken with a healthy pinch of caution: the Council of States still has to approve the WBK-S proposal here, as the WBK-S is only preparing the voting recommendation. Also, as fast as everything is moving at the moment, it could of course still happen that the change is already implemented in the year 2025/26. But we wanted to share a glimmer of hope with you after things had looked very difficult for so long.

You can find more information about the WBK-S meeting here:
WBK-S nimmt Beratung der BFI-Botschaft 2025-2028 auf (parlament.ch)

Categories
University Politics

VSETH goes Federal Palace

Now that the semester is over, things seem to have quietened down around the tuition fees. The posters have been taken down, the petition is only getting a few signatures a day and the campus is returning to its quiet state at the beginning of the learning phase. Or is it?

Not with us. The fight against tuition fee increase is far from over, not as long as we can still fight back. That’s why VSETH, together with VSS (Association of Swiss Student Bodies) and AGEPOLY (EPFL student association), visited the Federal Palace today to talk to various members of the WBK-S.

But what was the WBK-S again? 

The WBK-S is the Committee for Science, Education and Culture of the Council of States, i.e. a subgroup of the Council of States, so to speak, which deals with these topics in particular and is therefore especially interesting for us but also interested in us. 

The proposal to increase tuition fees will initially be discussed in this WBK-S and recommendations will be made, but depending on the situation, counter-proposals will also be drawn up or other measures taken. 

These recommendations are then very important for the Council of States’ decision on the tuition fees issue. And here again as a brief recap: only if the Council of States also approves the increase will it be finalised. So we still have hope. 

Anyway. I actually wanted to tell you about my day at the Federal Palace. We were there early in the morning and spoke directly to a representative of the centre-right parties in the Council of States. Luckily for me, he was very interested in our arguments, took a lot of notes and seemed quite convinced. 

Basically, the whole day went on like this. We met people from all sorts of parties across the political spectrum, told them about the situation at the ETHs, explained why we were so strongly against the increased fees and tried to convince them. Long things short: Some of them were open-minded and completely agreed with us, gave us tips on how we could make our arguments even better and introduced us to other parliamentarians. Others were initially critical, but were persuaded and still others simply found it interesting to talk to us, but quickly told us that they would definitely be in favour of the increase. 

And what does that mean now? 

What it always means. We continue to fight and try to show as many people as possible why the increase is a bad idea. 

But the day has shown me that many people are actually very interested in the students’ voice and that not all hope is lost. 

Categories
University Politics

Update Tuition Fees

The dreaded decision has been felled: The Nationalrat (big council of the Swiss parliament) decided today to grant ETH a budget growth of 1.7%, but also to change the ETH law and to define an at least three times higher tuition fee for newly incoming foreign students. You can find all details regarding this discussion here. This decision is not unexpected but it still hurts to see how parliament has decided to interfere in ETH’s autonomy and that ETH’s students now have to bear the burden of this and are being used as financial plasters and political statements.

But even if this is a very hard pill to swallow, not all is lost: This decision has yet to be passed through the Ständerat, i.e. the small council of parliament. They will be discussing this topic in the parliamentary session in September. Before that, in the same procedure as done for the Natinalrat, the finance commission and the commission for science, education and culture of the Ständerat will in August pre-discuss the upcoming topics of the Ständerat meeting and then make suggestions to the Ständerat. This means that we still have time to make our case with the members of the commissions and the Ständerat. This will mean lots of trips to Bern for VSETH board members but more importantly for you it means to keep being loud and making ourselves heard from Zurich to Bern that we won’t stand for such decisions being made over our heads. To do this sign our petition (https://fees.vseth.ethz.ch/en) and stay posted on the latest developments via our newsletter, blog and the VSETH Instagram. 

Categories
University Politics

101 tuition fees

Everything you need to know about the current tuition fee discussions

Feeling confused or downright overwhelmed? Curious about the (very) vibrant purple and orange VSETH campaign posters? Looking for explanations on the upcoming Swiss parliament vote that proposes tripling tuition fees for foreign students under the ETH Law? Well, you’re in the right place! Step into my (virtual) office, and let me tell you a tale involving budgets, missing millions, and an unhappy student association. Maybe you should sit down… Are you ready? Alright, let’s dive in!

To understand the whole situation we are in, we need to go back in time to autumn last year. At this point in time the federal council presented within their general budget discussions a first draft of the “BFI-Botschaft 2025-2028”, which amongst other things sets the budget of the ETH-Domain for the next years. These budget discussions were led under enormous financial pressure coming from various sides, mainly also due to inflation and the pandemic leaving a substantial financing deficit in the federal budget for 2022. The Swiss Federal Council was thus tasked with meeting financial obligations while adhering to the stringent “Schuldenbremse” (debt brake), resulting in substantial budget cuts across various sectors, including the ETH Domain. Specifically in this draft of the “BFI-Botschaft” it was revealed that the ETH Domain would receive less funding than required to sustain its previous growth rate. In Addition to this, in January 2024, the Federal Council announced a 100-million-franc budget cut for the ETH Domain in 2025. 

Now we are at the beginning of this year and ETH is facing huge budget cuts and also ever growing political pressure to cover costs by different means, i.e. increasing tuition. Here there was one obvious (and also politically pressured for) option for the ETH Board: According to the “ETH-Gesetz,” ETH can charge foreign students at most three times the fee paid by non-foreign students. Now we (i.e. VSETH) comes into play: When we found out about the discussion going on in the ETH board regarding the tuition increase, we set out to stop this increase from happening. We began to meet with the members of the ETH Board to explain to them why such an increase was unacceptable, sought contact with the students at EPFL and wrote a letter to the Federal Council. We did this with support from the heads of the ETH and EPFL schools, who gave a series of media interviews and loudly criticised the lack of federal funding in the ETH Domain. We fought and we won! On 7th March 2024, the ETH Board decided against an increase in tuition fees for foreign students. 

So how come we are now yet again discussing this threefold increase? Well this time it is not the incentive of the ETH board but actually directly coming from the confederation. In the past weeks the finance committee and the committee for science, education and culture of the Swiss parliament decided with a majority to propose to parliament to change the ETH law and make it obligatory for newly enrolling foreign students to pay at least triple the amount of tuition than Swiss students. This change of the law is now part of the discussion this coming Wednesday in parliament, when the whole “BFI-Botschaft” is supposed to be passed.

So now you might be thinking (and quite rightly so): Well shit. Going against the ETH board and getting them to change their minds: possible (and it obviously worked), but the Swiss lawmakers?! And this Wednesday?! Is the battle not lost already? To be frank: Yes, it is an enormous uphill battle and it is not clear if we can actually stop this from happening. But it is incredibly important to make ourselves heard in Bern and to resist this direct intervention of the Swiss parliament in ETH’s affairs! Also it is time to get the media and the public talking about this more diversely and to get our side of things represented more in this matter. VSETH strongly believes that students shouldn’t bear the brunt of symbolic acts or become pawns in political maneuvers and have to literally pay more because of these. The increase disproportionately impacts financially vulnerable students, and VSETH asserts that ETH should remain accessible to all, not just the financial elite.

Also we do have options. If it is decided on Wednesday that the law should be changed, then this is a long process and we would have the right to start a formal petition against this change of the law. This would need 50’000 supporting signatures in 100 days, so again not a minor task but we as VSETH have managed a successful petition before (and okay it was in the 1960s but still…). 

So, what’s the key takeaway? If you’re already enrolled as a foreign or non-foreign student at ETH, congratulations – this change (probably/hopefully) won’t affect you. But don’t let that fact dissuade you from voicing opposition! It is now of the utmost importance to make ourselves heard in Bern; that we won’t be played with like pawns or used as financial band-aids and that we don’t want ETH becoming a place for the financial elite, but to stay the diverse and internationally welcoming place it is!

Now that we’ve (hopefully) unraveled some of the confusion (perhaps replaced by a touch of indignation), it’s your turn to weigh in. Tell us how you feel about the Swiss parliament deciding over our heads how high tuition should be; sign our (informal) petition against the tuition fee increase; tell us how you would be affected by such an increase; post about this topic on social media, etc. The louder we are the better chances we have fighting this change of law.

Thank you for helping us! 

Categories
University Politics

What is PAKETH?

PAKETH stands for “Prüfungen und Akademischer Kalender an der ETH” which translates to Exams and Academic Calender at ETH. The project was initiated by Günther Dissertori and has the goal to reform teaching at ETH in a sustainable manner.

The main ideas of PAKETH are a week of vacation during autumn semester, shorter study phases in order to offer more vacation as well as making the system of exam blocks more flexible.

All details and all updates can be found on the official PAKETH website of ETH: https://ethz.ch/staffnet/en/teaching/projects/paketh.html

Categories
University Politics

We’re back!

We’re back! After we had forgotten this blog for two years, we decided to bring it back to life.

We plan on posting short blog entries regarding topics in university politics and updates regarding everything that’s going on in VSETH here.

Categories
University Politics

Christmas Time

The quietness on the blog here is a consequence of the very busy Christmas period at VSETH. Apart from appointments such as ETH Day, IDEALiStiC, the Budget MR or the VSS DV (blog articles will hopefully follow in January), Christmas means that we, as the board, say thank you to many people and organisations who have supported us over the past year. What sounds nice at first (and it is!) means a considerable organisational effort: 311 cards were written, signed by each board member and distributed together with 143 bottles of wine, 66 small and 49 large Samichlaussäckli (bags filled with chocolates). Our evenings were filled with wonderful Christmas dinners, even if that means that by the fifth fondue (or in the case of Mara and Nils already by the first) you can no longer see any cheese. We would like to take this opportunity to thank all the people we had the pleasure of meeting and working with during the past semester. A very big thank you goes to the Study Associations and committees whose board members made our day with their visits to our office in CAB. Merry Christmas and we look forward to seeing you next year!

Categories
University Politics

Looking back on the Hopo roundtable of 4.11.2021

Last Thursday evening, on November 4th, we met with 35 other students interested in university politics in the HG. After a short round of introductions with name, study program and expectations for the evening, we gave a short introduction to our daily life as Hopo board members. In order to be able to discuss more freely in a smaller setting, we then divided into discussion groups on the following topics; 

  • Student participation
  • General Think Tank
  • Mental Health
  • Beyond Covid
  • Performance elements and testing
  • Soft skills, marketability

Accompanied by vegan sushi and drinks, we exchanged views on what the respective status quo is and what the areas for action are. From this, concrete measures were then formulated, which were then presented in plenary. These were, for example, the demand to revise the academic calendar, one of our projects with the new rector, and making it easier to do an internship outside the academic framework. After that, there was the opportunity to exchange ideas independently of the groups and to get to know each other in a relaxed setting. In the final feedback session, we were particularly pleased to hear that even the participants who were only attracted by sushi were involved in interesting discussions and were themselves positively surprised by the evening. Due to the overwhelming demand, we will hold another Hopo round table this semester on December 13th (register for it here), where we will, among other things, discuss the academic calendar.

Categories
University Politics

Looking back on the FR on 02.11.2021

This Tuesday (02.11.) the third meeting of the Associations’ Council (Fachvereinsrat – FR) this semester took place. Unlike other FRs, this time the joint program started with a guided tour of the site development on the Hönggerberg, where we were introduced to the new construction projects, in particular the upcoming student center HIC, and the sustainability strategy on campus. After an aperitif (Apéro) in the alumni lounge, we headed to the HIL for the actual meeting. In the following three hours the agenda was worked through; after organizational matters and the announcements of the Chair of the Associations’ Council, it was time for the exchange of the student associations. This time information was exchanged about who can lend what, e.g. a slushie machine from VMP or fondue caquelons from APV. Due to a request to change the agenda, the board came next with VSS announcements, this time consisting of an information about the initiative “animal and human experimentation ban” and an update on Erasmus+. Afterwards, in the general board announcements a motion on the sustainability of the ETH Board was presented and feedback on wiegETHs measures in the departments was collected.  For the board statements the board left the room to allow delegates to gather questions for the board anonymously. The following discussion with everyone began with a round where each board member reported what had been on her or his mind the most over the past few weeks. The Treasury was pleased to report that the board now has access to its bank accounts. The two communication board members (Kommus) reported on the open day and shared that our common room no longer smells like curry sausage. After a short break, the last hour was devoted to revising the bylaws. The ARA (AGO Revision Consulting Board, AGO stands for the General Rules of Procedure) presented the most drastic changes to the bylaws, to which the student associations could then react. After the meeting there was the possibility to exchange outside and to drink a cup of mulled wine.